Across metropolitan areas, for example, mortgage foreclosure rates tend to be higher in precarious labor markets ( Dwyer & Lassus 2015). The risk shift identified by Hacker highlights the extent to which various forms of insecurity are interrelated, at both the aggregate and individual levels. Hacker (2006) blames the trend on an historic shift in the locus of risk, with households now expected to take greater responsibility for their own well-being in the face of corporate and governmental retreat from the provision of collective ‘social insurance’.
This insecurity is evident in a variety of domains, including employment, income, health care, and retirement ( Kalleberg 2011 Sullivan et al. Paradoxically, such patterns may contribute to a perception of displacement as random or unpredictable, further heightening public concern about the issue.ĭespite the obvious wealth and prosperity of the United States, many Americans have experienced growing economic insecurity during recent decades. Analysis of householder characteristics associated with displacement indicates that many longstanding disparities between advantaged and disadvantaged statuses persist, although they tend to be modest in size. We document fluctuations in the relatively small share of mobile households who move involuntarily but detect no clear upward trend over time. These definitions are operationalized with reason-for-move data from seven waves of the American Housing Survey conducted between 20.
Our components approach to the concept encourages definitions of varied emphasis and scope. Have the magnitude and correlates of residential displacement changed during the early twenty-first century in response to the foreclosure and eviction crises and escalating natural hazard disasters? We consider this possibility against the backdrop of past research on other causes of displacement.
0 kommentar(er)
